Perceptions of a neighborhood's characteristics, such as safety, were associated with sleep quality among low-income African American adults, but objective characteristics, such as crime rates, were not.

Is the Association Between Neighborhood Characteristics and Sleep Quality Mediated by Psychological Distress?

An Analysis of Perceived and Objective Measures of 2 Pittsburgh Neighborhoods

Published in: Sleep Health, v. 2, no. 4, Dec. 2016, p. 277-282

Posted on RAND.org on November 30, 2016

by Amy Soo Jin DeSantis, Wendy M. Troxel, Robin L. Beckman, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Gerald P. Hunter, Lauren Hale, Daniel J. Buysse, Tamara Dubowitz

Read More

Access further information on this document at Sleep Health

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Questions

  1. How are perceptions of a neighborhood and objective characteristics associated with sleep quality?
  2. To what extent does psychological distress explain associations between sleep quality and neighborhood characteristics?

Background

Living in disadvantaged neighborhood environments is associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes and higher overall mortality. However, the specific mechanisms underlying associations of neighborhood characteristics with health are not fully understood. Sleep quality represents an important potential mediator of these associations. Objectives: The objectives were to investigate associations of perceived and objective neighborhood characteristics with sleep and the extent to which associations are explained by psychological distress.

Design

The sample includes randomly selected households from 2 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically similar Pittsburgh communities.

Methods

Participants included 873 African American adults (77% female) with a median per capita household income of $13,300. Data were collected from in-person household surveys (sociodemographics, psychological distress, perceived neighborhood characteristics), daily sleep diaries, objective neighborhood street segment audits, and city crime data. We analyzed perceived and objective neighborhood characteristics and their association with sleep quality, and the degree to which psychological distress explained observed associations.

Results

Perceived neighborhood characteristics, including perceived safety (β = 0.13), neighborhood satisfaction (β = 0.14), social cohesion (β = 0.08), and perceived infrastructure (β = 0.07), were significantly associated with sleep quality (P values < .05), but objective neighborhood characteristics were not. Once psychological distress was considered, associations with perceived social cohesion and neighborhood infrastructure were fully attenuated. Associations of perceived safety and neighborhood satisfaction with sleep were attenuated by 20%–30% but remained significant.

Key Findings

  • Perceptions of neighborhood safety, social cohesion, and infrastructure were all associated with better sleep quality.
  • The associations found between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and sleep, coupled with previously known links between sleep and health, suggest that neighborhood characteristics may play a role in health disparities in the lower-income neighborhoods studied.
  • Degree of psychological distress, such as feelings of hopelessness and anxiety, explained some but not all of the associations between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and sleep.
  • In contrast to the link between sleep and neighborhood perceptions, no significant associations were found between sleep and objective neighborhood characteristics, such as broken windows, vacant lots, presence of sidewalks, and presence of services.

Recommendation

  • Efforts to build healthier communities, including enhancing neighborhood social cohesion, satisfaction, and safety, may have positive effects on sleep and downstream health consequences.
Access further information on this document at Sleep Health

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.