What Sort of Brexit Do the British People Want?

A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiments

Published in: King's College London website [Epub July 2017]

by Charlene Rohr, Alexandra Pollitt, David Howarth, Hui Lu, Jonathan Grant

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.kcl.ac.uk

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

To understand the sort of future relationship that the UK population want with the EU, we asked them to choose between different hypothetical options described by seven characteristics. Each of these characteristics ("attributes") could take several different values ("levels") in the choices presented to participants, reflecting different possible negotiating positions. By varying the characteristics of a potential deal in this way, we aimed to quantify people's preferences for different aspects of the UK's future relationship with the EU. Making trade-offs will be a key part in negotiating the UK's future relationship with the EU. The purpose of this study is to go beyond the political rhetoric, starting from the premise that compromises will have to made, and to try and understand what the British public think about these trade-offs. We go beyond the politically contested and sometimes ill-defined language of "hard" and "soft" Brexit and look at the public"s views about the detailed choices on offer. Our hope is that knowledge of where the public stand on different characteristics of the future relationship with the EU will inform those who are participating in the negotiations and give them some indication of which trade-offs are likely to satisfy the public's preferences.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.