Cover: What Sort of Brexit Do the British People Want?

What Sort of Brexit Do the British People Want?

A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiments

Published in: King's College London website [Epub July 2017]

Posted on Jul 13, 2017

by Charlene Rohr, Alexandra Pollitt, David Howarth, Hui Lu, Jonathan Grant

To understand the sort of future relationship that the UK population want with the EU, we asked them to choose between different hypothetical options described by seven characteristics. Each of these characteristics ("attributes") could take several different values ("levels") in the choices presented to participants, reflecting different possible negotiating positions. By varying the characteristics of a potential deal in this way, we aimed to quantify people's preferences for different aspects of the UK's future relationship with the EU. Making trade-offs will be a key part in negotiating the UK's future relationship with the EU. The purpose of this study is to go beyond the political rhetoric, starting from the premise that compromises will have to made, and to try and understand what the British public think about these trade-offs. We go beyond the politically contested and sometimes ill-defined language of "hard" and "soft" Brexit and look at the public"s views about the detailed choices on offer. Our hope is that knowledge of where the public stand on different characteristics of the future relationship with the EU will inform those who are participating in the negotiations and give them some indication of which trade-offs are likely to satisfy the public's preferences.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.