Systematic Review

United States Workforce for Autism-Related Child Healthcare Services

Published in: Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.027

Posted on RAND.org on June 10, 2019

by Ryan K. McBain, Vishnupriya Kareddy, Jonathan Cantor, Bradley D. Stein, Hao Yu

Read More

Access further information on this document at Elsevier Inc

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Objective

A diversity of United States health professional disciplines provide services for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We conducted a systematic review examining the availability, distribution and competencies of the U.S. workforce for autism-related child healthcare services, and assess studies' strength of evidence.

Method

We searched PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase and Google Scholar from 2008–2018 for relevant U.S.-based studies. Two investigators independently screened and evaluated studies against a set of pre-specified inclusion criteria and evaluated strength of evidence (SOE) using a framework designed to integrate a mixed-methods research.

Results

Of 754 records identified, 33 studies-24 quantitative, 6 qualitative and 3 mixed-methods-were included. Strength of evidence associated was low-to-moderate, with only 8 studies (24%) satisfying criteria for strong SOE. Geographies and provider cadres varied considerably: The most common specialties studied were: pediatricians (N=13), occupational therapists (N=12), speech therapists (N=11), physical therapists (N=10), and child psychiatrists (N=8). Topical areas included provider availability by service area and care delivery model, qualitative assessments of provider availability and competency, the role of insurance mandates in increasing access to providers, and disparities in access. Across provider categories, we found workforce availability for autism-related services was limited-in terms of overall numbers, time available and knowledgeability. Greatest unmet need was observed among minorities and in rural settings. Most studies were short-term, limited in scope, and used convenience samples.

Conclusion

There is limited evidence to characterize availability and distribution of the U.S. workforce for autism-related child healthcare services. Existing evidence to-date indicates significantly restricted availability.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.