Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly

A Spline Model Analysis

Denise D. Quigley, Marc N. Elliott, Mary Ellen Slaughter, Efrain Talamantes, Ron D. Hays

ResearchPosted on rand.org Mar 9, 2023Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 38, Issue 1, pages 221–227 (January 2023). doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y

Introduction

Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time.

Aim

Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experience.

Setting

Large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center.

Program

Trained providers observed patient care by colleagues and provided suggestions for improvement. Providers with OPRs < 90 (0–100-point scale) were eligible.

Evaluation

We used stratified randomization based on provider type and OPR to assign half of the 40 eligible providers to re-coaching. For OPR and PC, we fit mixed-effects regression models with random-effects for provider (level of treatment assignment) and fixed-effects for time (linear spline with knots and possible "jump" at initial coaching and re-coaching), previous OPR, patient characteristics, and sites. We observed a statistically significant medium jump among re-coached providers after re-coaching on OPR (3.7 points) and PC (3.5 points); differences of 1, 3, and ≥5-points for CAHPS measures are considered small, medium, and large. Improvements from re-coaching persisted for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC.

Discussion

Re-coaching improved patient experience more than initial coaching, suggesting the reactivation of knowledge from initial coaching. However, re-coaching gains also eroded. Coaching should occur every 6 to 12 months to maintain behaviors and scores.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: SpringerLink
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2023
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: EP-69177

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.