Research Brief
A Global Infrastructure to Support Expeditionary Aerospace Forces
Jan 1, 2000
Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Forces
New Agile Combat Support Postures
Download
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback68 pages | $25.00 | $20.00 20% Web Discount |
This report addresses support of emerging Air Force employment strategies associated with Expeditionary Aerospace Forces (EAFs).
Related Products
Table of Contents
Preface
Figures
Tables
Summary
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments
Acronyms
Chapter One
The New Security Environment and the USAF
Chapter Two
General Analytic Framework
Chapter Three
Support Infrastructure Components: FOLs and FSLs
Chapter Four
Expeditionary Deployment Performance: Prototype Analysis
Chapter Five
Analyzing Options for Expeditionary ACS
Appendix
Model Output for Prototype Cases
Bibliography
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND's Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.