Inspiration, Perspiration, and Time

Operations and Achievement in Edison Schools

Brian Gill, Laura S. Hamilton, J. R. Lockwood, Julie A. Marsh, Ron Zimmer, Deanna Hill, Shana Pribesh

ResearchPublished Sep 29, 2005

New forms of governing and managing public schools have proliferated in recent years, spawning the establishment and growth of companies contracted to operate public schools. Among these education management organizations (EMOs), the largest and most visible is Edison Schools. In 2000, Edison asked RAND to analyze its achievement outcomes and design implementation. RAND designed an evaluation to address the following research questions:

  • What are Edison’s strategies for promoting student achievement in the schools it manages?
  • How are Edison’s strategies implemented in those schools?
  • How does Edison’s management of schools affect student achievement?
  • What factors explain differences in achievement trends among Edison schools?

The resources and accountability systems that constitute Edison’s design represent a coherent, comprehensive, and ambitious strategy to address key elements relevant to providing high-quality education. The best-functioning Edison schools demonstrate the promise inherent in Edison’s model, but this monograph reports considerable variation in the extent to which the schools realize the Edison ideal.

Average rates of student proficiency in Edison schools improve over time. On average, gains of Edison schools during the first three years of Edison operation do not exceed the gains of matched conventional public schools, but Edison results improve in years four and five. Edison’s average long-term gains are comparable to or better than those of matched conventional public schools.

Analysis of a number of case-study Edison schools suggests that schools that effectively implement the wide-ranging Edison curriculum, establish Edison’s professional environment, and operate with strong instructional leaders under limited constraints have positive achievement results. Given that Edison’s results have not been uniformly positive, this monograph suggests some actions that Edison and its current and future clients can take to promote greater consistency of results, in terms of both implementation and student achievement.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
290 pages
List Price
$28.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2005
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 290
  • Paperback Price: $28.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-3824-1
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/MG351
  • Document Number: MG-351-EDU

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Gill, Brian, Laura S. Hamilton, J. R. Lockwood, Julie A. Marsh, Ron Zimmer, Deanna Hill, and Shana Pribesh, Inspiration, Perspiration, and Time: Operations and Achievement in Edison Schools, RAND Corporation, MG-351-EDU, 2005. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG351.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Gill, Brian, Laura S. Hamilton, J. R. Lockwood, Julie A. Marsh, Ron Zimmer, Deanna Hill, and Shana Pribesh, Inspiration, Perspiration, and Time: Operations and Achievement in Edison Schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2005. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG351.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Education for Edison Schools, Inc.

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.