Space Command Sustainment Review

Improving the Balance Between Current and Future Capabilities

Robert S. Tripp, Kristin F. Lynch, Shawn Harrison, John G. Drew, Charles Robert Roll, Jr.

ResearchPublished Jun 17, 2007

Cover: Space Command Sustainment Review
Download PDF

(Includes all revisions)

The ability to access and continuously operate in space is vital to the economic, social, and military interests of the United States. In part because of sometimes-conflicting demands and in part because space systems are highly specialized, sustainment can be a challenge. To help Air Force Space Command meet this challenge, the authors used a strategies-to-tasks framework to examine AFSPC sustainment as a whole, working toward a commandwide philosophy for space system support. The core of the philosophy is separation of demand-side, supply-side, and integrator processes and clear definition of roles and responsibilities at all levels of the command. Its adoption can provide a basis for enhancing processes, force development, doctrine, information systems, and organization across the command that can be sustained over time and through many leadership changes. The authors illustrate the implementation and benefits using specific systems and units, some of which have already demonstrated elements of this philosophy.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 166
  • Document Number: MG-518-AF

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Tripp, Robert S., Kristin F. Lynch, Shawn Harrison, John G. Drew, and Charles Robert Roll, Jr., Space Command Sustainment Review: Improving the Balance Between Current and Future Capabilities. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG518.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.