Options for Meeting the Maintenance Demands of Active Associate Flying Units

John G. Drew, Kristin F. Lynch, James M. Masters, Robert S. Tripp, Charles Robert Roll, Jr.

ResearchPublished Jun 5, 2008

The methodology developed in this research can be used to quantify and compare the key factors that allow the U.S. Air National Guard to generate peacetime training sorties with a fairly small full-time workforce. The authors apply these insights to proposed Total Force Integration initiatives to evaluate maintenance options for supporting associate units, where the goal of the unit is to produce trained pilots in the most efficient manner possible. The methodology evaluates how various types of personnel can influence the size and productivity of a unit.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Drew, John G., Kristin F. Lynch, James M. Masters, Robert S. Tripp, and Charles Robert Roll, Jr., Options for Meeting the Maintenance Demands of Active Associate Flying Units. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG611.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.