Reducing Costs, Increasing Capability
Nov 21, 2011
|PDF file||1.8 MB|
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
|Add to Cart||Paperback130 pages||$32.00||$25.60 20% Web Discount|
The U.S. Army uses Combat Support Hospitals (CSHs) — mobile, deployable hospitals housed in tents and expandable containers — to provide surgical and trauma care close to combat action. CSHs typically operate as hospitals only when deployed, and deployments occur only once every three to five years under the Army's rotational cycle. When not deployed, CSHs keep a partial set of equipment at home station for training or possible local emergency medical missions, while the remainder of the unit's equipment is in long-term storage at a site in the high desert of Northern California. This strategy of providing equipment for CSHs has created maintenance and obsolescence challenges. Nondeployed CSHs have old, poorly maintained equipment that is seldom or never used. Further, the Army has not programmed sufficient funds to keep all its CSH sets technologically current; in practice, deploying units do not deploy with their own equipment, but instead receive new medical equipment when deploying or take ownership of existing, upgraded equipment that is already deployed. RAND Arroyo Center researchers developed a new equipping strategy for the Army's CSHs, proposing three options for home station equipment sets: an “Expanded” design that provides more surgical and trauma capability and capacity; an “Enhanced” design that provides roughly the same amount of equipment but improved medical capabilities; and a “Lean” design that provides only enough equipment for some individual and team training. The research team also proposed changing the equipping strategy of deploying CSHs to eliminate much of the unit-owned equipment now residing in long-term storage. Deploying units would instead draw on a shared pool of up-to-date and well-maintained equipment. The proposed strategy would reduce total equipment costs from $1 billion to less than $700 million, leaving the Army with sufficient funds to continually upgrade and maintain both home-station and shared equipment.
CSH Personnel Perspectives on Equipping and Maintaining Combat Support Hospitals
Alternative Designs for Home Station Equipment Sets
Alternative Equipping Strategies
Assessing the Costs and Risks of Alternative Strategies
Toward an Improved CSH Equipping and Maintenance Strategy
How CSHs Currently Engage in Training to Achieve and Maintain Individual and Collective Skills
Development of Alternative Designs for Home Station Equipment Sets
Data Sources for Procurement and Upgrade Costs
Procurement Options to Manage Cost Growth and Obsolescence Risk in Medical Equipment
Simulation of Flows of CSH Units and Equipment in ARFOR GEN Cycle
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by RAND Arroyo Center and RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.