Report
Compensation for Losses from the 9/11 Attacks
Nov 2, 2004
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.6 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.5 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the federal government adopted the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), which requires insurers to make terrorism coverage available to commercial policyholders. In exchange, the federal government will reimburse insurers for a portion of insured losses above a particular threshold. TRIA's impending "sunset"-on December 31, 2005-presents an opportune time to evaluate what role the U.S. government should play in the terrorism insurance market and what approach should be taken to manage risks and to provide compensation for personal injury and property and financial losses due to acts of terrorism. This paper has a dual purpose: to help frame the central issues that should be considered in the debate over whether to extend, modify, or end TRIA, and to explore the broader issue of the appropriate role of disaster insurance within a system for managing risks created by the possibility of terrorist attacks and compensating losses caused by terrorist attacks. The paper also discusses options that policymakers might consider in addressing these issues and goals against which various options may be evaluated.
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Goals for a Risk-Management and Compensation System for Terrorism-Related Losses
Chapter Three
Key Issues in the Debate over TRIA and the Role of Insurance in a Terrorism Risk-Management and Compensation System
Chapter Four
Options
Chapter Five
Conclusions
Appendix A
Background on the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002
This research described in this report was conducted by the RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.