China's Economic Deterrence Playbook
Expert InsightsPublished Sep 10, 2025
Expert InsightsPublished Sep 10, 2025
This paper examines China's evolving strategy of economic deterrence, arguing that while it lacks a formal doctrine, it has developed a coherent and effective system that discourages economic coercion from third parties. The authors identify five core elements underpinning China's strategy: enhancing resilience in critical sectors, fostering strategic interdependencies, maintaining a ready-to-deploy economic retaliation toolbox, building credibility through consistent coercive actions, and preparing the domestic population to absorb economic shocks. These elements are not part of an official economic deterrence strategy, but they are embedded in broader national security and economic policies and are operationalised through mechanisms such as the dual circulation strategy, long-term resource contracts, industrial subsidies, and retaliatory legal instruments like the Export Control Law.
The paper distinguishes between deterrence by denial, entanglement, and punishment, noting China's shift toward deterrence by dependence — leveraging asymmetric interdependencies to discourage adversarial actions. It also highlights the importance of credibility and communication in sustaining deterrence, supported by China's track record of economic retaliation. Finally, the paper assesses the applicability of lessons from China's approach to Europe, emphasising the EU and UK's current limitations in strategic coherence, collaboration, and credibility. It calls for a more structured and collective European approach to economic deterrence, leveraging regulatory power, innovation, and strategic interdependence to safeguard sovereignty in an increasingly weaponised global economy.
Funding for this independent research was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The work was conducted by RAND Europe.
This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.