Allocating Chlorofluorocarbon Permits

Who Gains, Who Loses, and What Is the Cost?

Adele Palmer, Timothy H. Quinn

ResearchPublished 1981

The use of economic incentives, such as pollution taxes or marketable permits, for environmental control has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This report examines alternative ways to implement marketable permits in the case of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) regulations currently under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The authors examine alternative strategies for administering marketable permits under a CFC quota. In one case, the permits would be sold (auctioned to the highest bidders). In the remaining cases, the permits would be given away (allocated) to different groups of recipients according to different rules (formulas) determining how many permits each recipient would receive. The policy choice among alternative forms of implementing CFC marketable permits is not an easy one. It requires tradeoffs among administrative costs, economic efficiency, and concerns about how regulations' costs are distributed among members of society.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
132 pages
List Price
$35.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1981
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 132
  • Paperback Price: $35.00
  • Document Number: R-2806-EPA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Palmer, Adele and Timothy H. Quinn, Allocating Chlorofluorocarbon Permits: Who Gains, Who Loses, and What Is the Cost? RAND Corporation, R-2806-EPA, 1981. As of September 17, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2806.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Palmer, Adele and Timothy H. Quinn, Allocating Chlorofluorocarbon Permits: Who Gains, Who Loses, and What Is the Cost? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1981. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2806.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.