Potential Constraints on Cumulative Global Production of Chlorofluorocarbons

by W. E. Mooz, Kathleen A. Wolf, Frank Camm


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback82 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Atmospheric models have suggested that cumulative emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) pose a potential threat to the stratospheric ozone layer, but cumulative emissions can grow only if the supply of these chemicals is not constrained. Observers have suggested a wide range of potential supply constraints, two of which could have a significant effect on long-run cumulative emissions: (1) regulation-induced disincentives to invest in new CFC production capacity, and (2) natural limits on the economic availability of the fluorine used to manufacture CFCs. This report examines the likely importance of these two constraints by focusing on the two CFCs with the greatest potential to deplete stratospheric ozone, CFC-11 and CFC-12. The findings suggest that regulation-induced disincentives to invest and natural limits on fluorine sources should not impede continued production of CFC-11 and CFC-12.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.