Cover: Economic Impact Assessment of a Chlorofluorocarbon Production Cap

Economic Impact Assessment of a Chlorofluorocarbon Production Cap

Published 1981

by Adele Palmer, Timothy H. Quinn

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback92 pages $30.00

To assist federal rulemaking, the study projects economic costs of a regulatory "cap" restricting annual chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) production to the 1980 level. It examines costs generated by industry and consumer response to the regulation in several alternative scenarios. It concludes that between 1980-1990 the cap could cost the U.S. economy up to $342 million if industries and consumers adjust slowly to higher prices caused by restricted CFC supplies. If they exploit CFC-saving opportunities earlier in the decade, costs could accumulate to only $275 million. However, the cap would cause wealth transfers, from CFC-using industries and their customers to other parts of the economy, up to 12 times higher than those estimates. Although most CFC-using firms should cope with higher costs, some firms using CFC for foam packaging materials could go out of business if rising prices caused customers to buy alternative materials. Resulting layoffs could reach 2,000 nationwide.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.