Economic Implications of Regulating Nonaerosol Chlorofluorocarbon Emissions

An Executive Briefing

by Adele Palmer, W. E. Mooz, Timothy H. Quinn, Kathleen A. Wolf

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback34 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Concern over danger to the ozone layer led the Environmental Protection Agency to ban most chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) aerosol applications, but U.S. nonaerosol emissions could reach 600 million pounds annually by 1990. The report examines two strategies for controlling emissions, one based on mandatory controls, the other on economic incentives. Either could reduce accumulated emissions a modest 15 percent over the next ten years. The policy ultimately chosen will depend on more accurate knowledge of CFC depletion of the ozone layer, if any, of the resulting environmental damage, and thus of the desired level of emission reductions. If drastic reductions are required, beyond those achievable by controls, the choice appears to lie between outright bans and economic incentives. Bans would impose very high costs on user groups and the economy as a whole. Economic incentives would impose lower costs on the economy, but could seriously injure CFC user-industries unless wealth transfers were compensated.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.