Economic Implications of Regulating Chlorofluorocarbon Emissions from Nonaerosol Applications
Jan 1, 1980
An Executive Briefing
|Add to Cart||Paperback34 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
Concern over danger to the ozone layer led the Environmental Protection Agency to ban most chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) aerosol applications, but U.S. nonaerosol emissions could reach 600 million pounds annually by 1990. The report examines two strategies for controlling emissions, one based on mandatory controls, the other on economic incentives. Either could reduce accumulated emissions a modest 15 percent over the next ten years. The policy ultimately chosen will depend on more accurate knowledge of CFC depletion of the ozone layer, if any, of the resulting environmental damage, and thus of the desired level of emission reductions. If drastic reductions are required, beyond those achievable by controls, the choice appears to lie between outright bans and economic incentives. Bans would impose very high costs on user groups and the economy as a whole. Economic incentives would impose lower costs on the economy, but could seriously injure CFC user-industries unless wealth transfers were compensated.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.