Command and Control of Joint Air Operations

Some Lessons Learned from Four Case Studies of an Enduring Issue

James A. Winnefeld, Dana J. Johnson

ResearchPublished 1991

This report examines the achievement of the principle of unity of effort from a narrow focus on the command and control of U.S. joint tactical air operations in four campaigns (Midway, the Solomons, Korea, and Vietnam) from 1942 to 1968 and extracts some lessons for future joint air operations. The authors distinguish between unity of effort and unity of command, a distinction that manifests itself in individual service doctrines, in joint operations, and, ultimately, in each of the Services' views of war. While unity of command is one of several steps necessary to achieve unity of effort, the authors recommend that debate should be centered around the accomplishment of unity of effort. The research was completed before the onset of combat operations in Kuwait and Iraq in early 1991. The authors hope to extend the analysis to cover that campaign in a subsequent publication.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
100 pages
List Price
$30.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1991
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 100
  • Paperback Price: $30.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-1157-2
  • Document Number: R-4045-RC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Winnefeld, James A. and Dana J. Johnson, Command and Control of Joint Air Operations: Some Lessons Learned from Four Case Studies of an Enduring Issue, RAND Corporation, R-4045-RC, 1991. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R4045.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Winnefeld, James A. and Dana J. Johnson, Command and Control of Joint Air Operations: Some Lessons Learned from Four Case Studies of an Enduring Issue. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1991. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R4045.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, or independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.