Estimating Requirements for Aircraft Recoverable Spares and Depot Repair

Executive Summary

by John Abell


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback38 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Aircraft recoverable spares and depot-level component repair are a major annual expenditure for the Air Force. In the mid-1980s, they absorbed roughly $5 billion annually. In this executive summary, Abell suggests initiatives that will enable the Air Force to reduce its investments in aircraft recoverable spares while maintaining roughly its traditional levels of aircraft availability. These initiatives include fundamental changes in policy as well as improvements in requirements estimation techniques. One policy recommendation is to improve the responsiveness of depot-level component repair. Such improvement includes repairing the components that are the most important to the achievement of aircraft availability goals, minimizing the time parts are in the repair pipeline, and responding quickly to urgent, unanticipated demands. A second policy recommendation is to consolidate the storage and management of war readiness spares.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.