Estimating Aircraft Recoverable Spares Requirements with Cannibalization of Designated Items

by Donald P. Gaver, Karen E. Isaacson, John Abell


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback32 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

To estimate requirements for primary operating stocks (POS) of aircraft recoverable spare parts, the Air Force has not, as a matter of policy, assumed that parts shortages can be consolidated among aircraft (cannibalized). It has, however, assumed perfect consolidation of shortages in its computation of war readiness spares requirements, designating which parts are relatively easy to cannibalize and which are not. The research described in this report shows that a policy of designated cannibalization in estimating POS requirements is cost-effective. The authors present a computational model that incorporates designated cannibalization, determining the probability of meeting a specified aircraft availability goal with a specified confidence. They conclude that a designated cannibalization policy for POS can reduce safety stock requirements while maintaining traditional levels of system performance.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.