Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The goal of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is to ensure that all children are proficient in reading and mathematics by the 2013–2014 school year. A key strategy of NCLB is to hold states, districts, and schools accountable for children’s mastery of state content standards, as measured by state tests; information about districts’ and schools’ performance is to be shared with parents and educators and used to direct assistance to underperforming schools. This report draws on two federally funded studies — the Study of State Implementation of Accountability and Teacher Quality Under NCLB and the National Longitudinal Study of NCLB — to assess the progress that states, districts, and schools have made in implementing NCLB’s accountability provisions through 2004–2005. The authors find that all states have enacted the accountability provisions required by NCLB and that most schools made adequate yearly progress (AYP) in 2003–2004. High-poverty, high-minority, and urban schools were less likely to make AYP, and many of the schools that were identified for improvement reported needing technical assistance, especially to serve students with special needs, such as those with disabilities or limited English proficiency. Almost all schools reported engaging in voluntary improvement efforts. However, the authors note that NCLB accountability requirements are flexible in a number of areas, including how states defined their standards and “proficiency,” and, as a result, there is large variation across states in the number and types of schools targeted for improvement.

Reprinted with permission from “State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume III — Accountability Under NCLB: Interim Report,” by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, Washington D.C., 2007.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    State Standards, Assessments, and Targets

  • Chapter Three

    Early Results: Meeting AYP Targets

  • Chapter Four

    Identifying Schools and Districts for Improvement

  • Chapter Five

    Providing Information About School Performance to Stakeholders

  • Chapter Six

    Actions to Promote School and District Improvement

  • Appendix A

    Description of NLS-NCLB and SSI-NCLB Methodologies

  • Appendix B

    State AYP Definitions

  • Appendix C

    Supplemental Exhibits

  • Appendix D

    Standard Error Exhibits

Originally published as: “State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume III — Accountability Under NCLB: Interim Report,” by the U.S. Department of Education, 2007.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.