Research Brief
Evaluating Teacher Quality Under No Child Left Behind
Sep 18, 2007
State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act
Volume II -- Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Interim Report
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 3.9 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
A central goal of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is to ensure that every child is taught by a highly qualified teacher. NCLB requires states to set standards that teachers must meet to be considered highly qualified. To help improve the qualifications of teachers, the law provides funds that states can use to improve certification systems and recruit and retain highly qualified teachers. NCLB also supports ongoing professional development for all teachers. Finally, NCLB sets standards for the qualifications of instructional paraprofessionals (teacher aides) employed with Title I funds, recognizing that, in many Title I schools, paraprofessionals play a substantial role in children’s educational experiences. This report describes the progress that states, districts, and schools have made toward NCLB’s goal of providing children with teachers and paraprofessionals who will help them achieve at high levels of proficiency. The authors find that most teachers meet their states requirements to be considered highly qualified, but that these requirements vary widely from state to state, raising questions about whether some states’ standards are sufficiently high. The report also finds that the percentage of teachers who are not highly qualified is higher for teachers of special education students, teachers of students with limited English proficiency, and teachers in high-poverty and high-minority schools. In addition, only about two-thirds of instructional paraprofessionals are considered qualified under NCLB. The authors conclude that these and other issues must be addressed if NCLB’s goal of having an improved teaching workforce and thus better-served students is to be fully realized.
Reprinted with permission from “State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume II — Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Interim Report,” by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Development, Policyand Program Studies Service, Washington D.C., 2007.
Related Products
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
State Policies and Data Systems for Highly Qualified Teachers
Chapter Three
Teachers' Highly Qualified Status Under NCLB
Chapter Four
Recruitment and Retention of Highly Qualified Teachers and Support for Teachers Who Were Not Highly Qualified
Chapter Five
Professional Development
Chapter Six
Implementation of NCLB Requirements for Title I Paraprofessionals
Appendix A
Description of NLS-NCLB and SSI-NCLB Methodologies
Appendix B
Supplemental NLS-NCLB Exhibits and Standard Error Reports
Appendix C
Supplemental State Exhibits
Originally published as: “State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume II — Teacher Quality Under NCLB: Interim Report,” by the U.S. Department of Education, 2007.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.