This report is one of a series designed to support Air Force leaders in promoting resilience among its Airmen, civilian employees, and Air Force families. It examines the relationship between nutritional fitness and resilience, using key constructs found in the scientific literature that address address self-regulation, positive affect, perceived control, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and optimism.

Nutritional Fitness and Resilience

A Review of Relevant Constructs, Measures, and Links to Well-Being

Karen Rocío Flórez, Regina A. Shih, Margret T. Martin

ResearchPublished Sep 30, 2014

This report is one of a series designed to support Air Force leaders in promoting resilience among its Airmen, civilian employees, and Air Force family members. It examines the relationship between nutritional fitness and resilience, using key constructs found in the scientific literature that address self-regulation, positive affect, perceived control, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and optimism. Supporting or increasing the levels of the key measures of nutritional fitness identified in this report may facilitate resilience and can protect Airmen, civilian employees, and Air Force families from the negative effects of stress. The report also reviews construct measures, well-being, and resilience outcomes as well as interventions designed to promote the nutritional fitness constructs.

Key Findings

Nutritional fitness is a key factor that can affect an individual's resilience and readiness to perform military duties

  • Being nutritionally unfit may prevent an individual from adequately coping with the stress of military duty.
  • Nutritional fitness contributes to resilience by helping service members maintain a healthy weight.
  • Nutritional fitness contributes to resilience by protecting service members against diet-related diseases that affect physical and cognitive functions.
  • Nutritional fitness contributes to resilience by reducing service members' vulnerability to stress and depression.

Recommendations

  • Additional research is needed to determine how effective specific interventions might be within the Air Force.
  • The types of stressors commonly experienced in the Air Force should be identified.
  • The Air Force should take a first step toward measuring the facilitators and barriers to service members' efforts to maintain a healthful diet.
  • Nutritional fitness should be monitored using valid and reliable measures.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
86 pages
List Price
$19.95
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2014
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 86
  • Paperback Price: $19.95
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-8260-2
  • Document Number: RR-105-AF

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Flórez, Karen Rocío, Regina A. Shih, and Margret T. Martin, Nutritional Fitness and Resilience: A Review of Relevant Constructs, Measures, and Links to Well-Being, RAND Corporation, RR-105-AF, 2014. As of October 3, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR105.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Flórez, Karen Rocío, Regina A. Shih, and Margret T. Martin, Nutritional Fitness and Resilience: A Review of Relevant Constructs, Measures, and Links to Well-Being. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR105.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was conducted within the Manpower, Personnel, and Training Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.