- What are VA's current resources and capabilities?
- What are current levels of access to VA care?
- What is the quality of VA care?
- What are VA's projected resources and capabilities to provide timely and accessible care, and how might different policies enhance VA's resources and capabilities for treating veterans in the future?
The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 addressed the need for access to timely, high-quality health care for veterans. Section 201 of the legislation called for an independent assessment of various aspects of veterans' health care. The RAND Corporation was tasked with an assessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA's) current and projected health care capabilities and resources. An examination of data from a variety of sources, along with a survey of VA medical facility leaders, revealed the breadth and depth of VA resources and capabilities: fiscal resources, workforce and human resources, physical infrastructure, interorganizational relationships, and information resources. The assessment identified barriers to the effective use of these resources and capabilities. Analysis of data on access to VA care and the quality of that care showed that almost all veterans live within 40 miles of a VA health facility, but fewer have access to VA specialty care. Veterans usually receive care within 14 days of their desired appointment date, but wait times vary considerably across VA facilities. VA has long played a national leadership role in measuring the quality of health care. The assessment showed that VA health care quality was as good or better on most measures compared with other health systems, but quality performance lagged at some VA facilities. VA will require more resources and capabilities to meet a projected increase in veterans' demand for VA care over the next five years. Options for increasing capacity include accelerated hiring, full nurse practice authority, and expanded use of telehealth.
VA Faces Challenges in Planning for and Using Its Resources Effectively
- VA is one of the largest health providers in the world, but its workforce and facility capacity may not be sufficient to provide timely care to veterans across a number of key specialties, as well as primary care.
- Purchased care offers one solution to these limitations, but VA faces challenges in managing this option.
- Accelerated hiring and productivity increases, aided by technology, will be necessary if VA is to meet an anticipated increase in demand for care over the next five years.
Some Veterans Face Barriers to Accessing VA Health Care in a Timely Manner
- The vast majority of veterans live within 40 miles of VA care but actual geographic access varies according to the access standard used and by region and type of service.
- According to VA standards, most veterans do not face long waits for care, but there is considerable variation in timeliness across facilities. VA patients report that they are less likely than private-sector patients to get appointments as soon as needed.
- VA's timeliness standard is much less demanding than the standards used in the private sector.
The Quality of VA Care Is Good Overall, but Performance Varies Across Facilities
- VA outpatient care outperformed non-VA outpatient care on almost all quality measures. VA hospitals performed the same or better than non-VA hospitals on most inpatient quality measures, but worse on others.
- Although most VA facilities maintain high levels of quality, there is variation across facilities, with best practices not universally identified or adopted.
- VA should take significant steps to improve access to care. It should use a systematic, continuous performance improvement process to reduce variability in access to care and evaluate options for increasing its capacity, including hiring additional providers, granting advanced practice nurses full practice authority, and increasing the use of virtual care.
- VA should systematically identify opportunities to improve access through the use of purchased care. It should streamline programs for purchasing care and use them strategically to minimize cost.
- VA should reexamine its standards for timely access to care and consider alternatives. Specifically, it should examine the utility of existing benchmarks, such as same-day availability of appointments, used in other health care systems.
- VA and Congress should develop and implement more sensitive standards for geographic access to care. Better data collection and analysis would help VA determine where veterans are facing geographic access barriers and where purchased care could fill access gaps.
- VA should establish itself as a leader and innovator in health care redesign. VA has historically been on the forefront of health care innovations, and being a large, integrated delivery system positions it to continue to do so.
Table of Contents
Overview of Methods
Assessment of VA Resources and Capabilities
Assessment of Access to VA Care
Assessment of Quality of VA Care
Improving Access for Veterans
Conclusions and Recommendations
The research described in this report was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and conducted by RAND Health, a division of the RAND Corporation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.