Evaluation of Two Programs Supporting Global Family Planning Data Needs
Feb 5, 2018
In 2013, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launched two programs to help monitor progress toward a new global goal to increase modern contraceptive use by 2020: Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) and Track20. This evaluation of both programs is based on interviews with more than 260 stakeholders, statistical analysis of the PMA2020 survey, and analysis of stakeholder ratings of data maturity and sustainability.
Assessing Achievements, Informing Future Directions
|PDF file||2.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback266 pages||$70.00||$56.00 20% Web Discount|
In 2013, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launched two programs to help monitor progress toward a new global goal to increase modern contraceptive use by 2020. The Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) program aimed to support annual, rapid-turnaround, nationally representative surveys of households and service delivery points in nine countries. Track20 was designed to support global standardization of key family planning indicators and country-level monitoring and capacity-building in 22 countries. This evaluation of both programs is based on interviews with more than 260 stakeholders in the United States and 15 program countries, statistical analysis of the PMA2020 survey, and analysis of stakeholder ratings of data maturity and sustainability.
Stakeholders felt that PMA2020 has successfully conducted annual, rapid-turnaround surveys with high-quality data. However, it has not fully achieved its original objectives of promoting data use, meeting local data needs, or integrating PMA2020 into country data systems. The team's statistical analysis of PMA2020 surveys identified opportunities for modifications in survey frequency, design, and content. Stakeholders felt that Track20 is on target to achieve most of its objectives. Monitoring and evaluation officers are the core of Track20 in program countries: They are highly skilled personnel, typically embedded within ministries of health, giving them ready access to decisionmakers. The RAND research team recommended that both programs promote country-driven agendas for data collection, use, and ownership; intensify focus on data use; and plan for and measure data maturity and data system sustainability. The research team also recommended a new program — Data for Action Training Activity for Family Planning (DATA-FP) — to increase country capacity for data system management.
Stakeholder Views on Family Planning Data Needs
PMA2020 Goals, Accomplishments, and Challenges
Statistical Properties of PMA2020
PMA2020 Survey Design
Track20 Goals, Accomplishments, and Challenges
Interactions Between PMA2020 and Track20
Conclusions and Recommendations
Details of PMA2020 Sampling Procedures
Indicators Collected by PMA2020, FP2020, and DHS
Comparison of Selected Family Planning Data Sources
Additional Background on Logic Models
Additional Background on Data Maturity Models
Additional Background on Sustainability Enablers
Contextual Information on the 15 Countries Evaluated
Additional Detail on Statistical Methods and Country-Specific Analyses
The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Health and supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All users of the publication are permitted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and transform and build upon the material, including for any purpose (including commercial) without further permission or fees being required.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.