Building a Repository of Assessments of Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Higher-Order Cognitive Competencies

Jonathan Schweig, Garrett Baker, Laura S. Hamilton, Brian M. Stecher

ResearchPublished Nov 1, 2018

This report describes the development of an online repository of assessments of interpersonal, intrapersonal, and higher-order cognitive competencies. It lists more than 200 assessments, including associated descriptive and evaluative information. The repository enables practitioners, researchers, and policymakers to explore what assessments are available and obtain key information about what they are designed to measure, how they operate, what demands they place on students and teachers, and what kinds of uses their scores support.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Schweig, Jonathan, Garrett Baker, Laura S. Hamilton, and Brian M. Stecher, Building a Repository of Assessments of Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Higher-Order Cognitive Competencies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2508.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.