Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This report documents the development of the frequency models that form part of TfL's Model of Travel in London (MoTiON). The frequency models are estimated using observed data on individual's choice of travelling considering different personal and household characteristics.

A focus of the model estimation work was to specify the models to ensure that the models represented an average weekday during school term time to better represent the peak levels of demand on London's highway and public transport networks.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Frequency model structure

  • Chapter Three

    Analysis of tour rate changes

  • Chapter Four

    Home-based frequency models

  • Chapter Five

    Non-home-based frequency model results

  • Chapter Six

    Summary and recommendations

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for Transport for London (TfL) and conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.