Net Technical Assessment

A Methodology for Assessing Military Technology Competition

Jon Schmid, Chad J. R. Ohlandt, Shawn Cochran

ResearchPublished May 28, 2024

Note: In June 2024, Chapter 2 was updated to address instances where "NTA" was incorrectly used in place of "net assessment."

The Biden administration's 2022 National Security Strategy recognizes technology as a major front on which strategic competition is waged. The centrality of technology to the conduct and outcome of strategic competition motivates an analytic task: the development of methodologies for assessing the state of play of technological competition. This report proposes one such methodology for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD): a net technical assessment (NTA), which, for a given technology area, is designed to characterize the technical state of the art, measure relative national standing, and identify and assess technology applications for accomplishing strategically important military objectives.

This NTA methodology is informed by the long-standing net assessment approach but tailored to assess the impact of select technologies on strategic competition. The practice of net assessment was largely developed by Andrew Marshall during his time at the RAND Corporation and the Office of Net Assessment. Marshall proposed that to correctly understand a country's strategic behavior requires abandoning traditional (rational actor-based) approaches to evaluating military power in favor of a novel approach built on the detailed empirical study of the myriad factors that affect national strategic behavior in practice. The approach presented in this report leverages Marshall's insight and proposes an assessment methodology that connects demonstrated national technical capabilities in the context of scenario-based reasoning (cognizant of the complexity of competitors' domestic bureaucracies and institutions below the national level) and draws on tools, ideas, and concepts from diverse disciplines based on their practical utility in advancing the assessment task at hand.

Key Findings

  • A DoD-specific NTA could be informed by long-standing net assessment approaches tailored to assess the impact of select technologies on strategic competition.
  • The NTA should be designed to characterize the technical state of art, measure relative national standing, and identify and assess technology applications for accomplishing strategically important military objectives.
  • The proposed NTA should connect demonstrated national technical capabilities in the context of scenario-based reasoning and draw on tools, ideas, and concepts from diverse disciplines using their practical utility in advancing the assessment task at hand.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
56 pages
List Price
$14.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2024
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 56
  • Paperback Price: $14.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 1-9774-1292-0
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1350-1
  • Document Number: RR-A1350-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Schmid, Jon, Chad J. R. Ohlandt, and Shawn Cochran, Net Technical Assessment: A Methodology for Assessing Military Technology Competition, RAND Corporation, RR-A1350-1, 2024. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1350-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Schmid, Jon, Chad J. R. Ohlandt, and Shawn Cochran, Net Technical Assessment: A Methodology for Assessing Military Technology Competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1350-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This research was sponsored by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD[R&E]) and conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Program of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.