Evaluation of how the Netherlands determined its position in the Brexit negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom, the extent that the Dutch efforts are reflected in the withdrawal and trade and cooperation agreements, the preparations of the Dutch government for the consequences of Brexit (through contingency planning, preparedness measures, crisis management, PPP and campaigns) and whether public expenditures were effective.

Evaluatie rijksbrede Brexit-inzet van de Nederlandse overheid: Eindrapport

[Evaluation of the Dutch government's efforts to prepare for Brexit]

Stijn Hoorens, Fook Nederveen, Giselle Schellekens, Douwe Hylkema, Romana Michelon, Vincent Janssen, Iris Leussink, Christian Van Stolk, Robert Wester

ResearchPublished Dec 19, 2022

Cover: Evaluatie rijksbrede Brexit-inzet van de Nederlandse overheid: Eindrapport
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes English-Language Executive Summary

Note: This report is in Dutch. An English-language summary is available.

After the British vote to leave the European Union, the stakes were high for the Netherlands. The United Kingdom is one of the Netherlands' main trading partners and tens of thousands of Dutch citizens resided, studied, or lived in the UK on the basis of their EU citizenship — and vice versa. The Dutch preparations for Brexit extended to the full breadth of the central government, as EU regulations affect almost all policy areas. Although the European Commission led the negotiations with the UK, the Dutch government wanted to ensure that Dutch interests were properly represented, Dutch laws and regulations were adapted in preparation for the new European external border, and that other stakeholders such as citizens and businesses were informed and properly prepared.

The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs commissioned RAND Europe and Berenschot to evaluate whether the central government achieved these goals. Based on a mixed-methods approach consisting of desk research, stakeholder interviews, an online survey and focus groups, we assessed how the Netherlands determined its position in the Brexit negotiations between the EU and the UK, the extent that Dutch efforts were reflected in the Withdrawal and Trade and Cooperation agreements, the Dutch government’s preparations for the consequences of Brexit (through contingency planning, preparedness measures, crisis management, public-private partnerships, and campaigns) and whether public expenditures were effective.

Key Takeaways

  • The government of the Netherlands was well organised for the Brexit negotiations between the UK and the EU, which contributed to effective advocacy during the negotiations.
  • Stakeholders within the Dutch government believe the Netherlands was well prepared for the consequences of Brexit due to effective interdepartmental cooperation and planning. Companies and citizens also predominantly reflect positive on the government's efforts, though much less so by Dutch citizens living in the UK.
  • Insufficient budgetary information was present or provided to assess effectiveness. Where we did have detailed information, however, we found no evidence that the funds were spent inefficiently.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hoorens, Stijn, Fook Nederveen, Giselle Schellekens, Douwe Hylkema, Romana Michelon, Vincent Janssen, Iris Leussink, Christian Van Stolk, and Robert Wester, Evaluatie rijksbrede Brexit-inzet van de Nederlandse overheid: Eindrapport: [Evaluation of the Dutch government's efforts to prepare for Brexit]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1900-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken and conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.