Effective Digital Capability Development

Enabling NATO Digital Capabilities Series: Paper 2

Rebecca Lucas, Judith Huismans, Nicolas Jouan, Ondrej Palicka, Erik Silfversten

ResearchPublished May 14, 2025

Cover: Effective Digital Capability Development

This is the second in a series of three papers exploring the evolving role of digital capabilities in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). This paper seeks to explore how NATO currently resources digital capability development, explore barriers and enablers for digital capability development, and better understand the implications of underinvestment in digital capabilities.

The papers were sponsored by Microsoft as part of a broader package of work to explore how NATO and its members can progress the development of digital capabilities, how the development of such capabilities can be more effectively enabled, and how these capabilities can enhance NATO's resilience and interoperability. The full series of papers is intended to drive preparatory discussions on the importance and future of NATO's digital capabilities ahead of the June 2025 summit in The Hague.

Key Takeaways

  • Given the breadth, diversity, and cross-cutting nature of digital capabilities, it can be a challenge to isolate funding designated specifically for digital initiatives.
  • Recognised challenges with NATO capability development impact digital capabilities as much as any other: these include unsuitable or overly bureaucratic processes, varying priorities across the alliance, limited risk appetite on the part of NATO procurement agencies, and poor collaboration between Allies.
  • The unique nature of digital capabilities also raises a number of factors that particularly impact digital capability development, including the establishment of clear strategic priorities; the availability of suitably qualified and experienced personnel; and a heightened need for continuous and effective engagement with the private sector.

Recommendations

  • The continuing relevance of barriers to digital capability development requires NATO to understand the risks of insufficient or inefficient investment in digital capabilities — including creating obstacles in executing NATO's core missions and jeopardising the long-term strategic advantage that NATO gains from advanced digital capabilities.
  • Increased coherence of definitions of digital capability would better allow investment in this area to be tracked and understood, both within NATO as an organisation and across its members.
  • NATO should continue to develop a more coordinated digital transformation approach leveraging spiral development to stay ahead of rapidly evolving threats, deploy updates more quickly, and work more closely with industry and innovation partners.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Lucas, Rebecca, Judith Huismans, Nicolas Jouan, Ondrej Palicka, and Erik Silfversten, Effective Digital Capability Development: Enabling NATO Digital Capabilities Series: Paper 2. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2025. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA3831-2.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.