The Impact of a Spouse Incentive on Employee Retention
Evidence from a Military Spouse Scholarship
Download eBook for Free
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Jobs that demand household mobility can make it difficult for spouses in dual-earner couples to find a job following a work-related move, potentially leading to lower employee retention. Active component military personnel are typically required to relocate every two to three years. The authors evaluate the impact of the U.S. Department of Defense's My Career Advancement Account (MyCAA) Scholarship program, which provides tuition assistance to military spouses for education and training in portable career fields, on the retention of military personnel. Using a propensity-score matching analysis comparing MyCAA households to similarly eligible households of nonusers, they find consistent and sustained evidence for its impact on military service member retention for at least six years following the spouse's receipt of the scholarship. The relationship is larger for service members whose spouses are seeking associate degrees rather than occupational certificates. Moreover, the authors find indications that the cost of using the MyCAA spousal scholarship during 2011–2017 to encourage a service member's continued service was similar to prior cost estimates of using selective bonuses to promote retention during 2002–2007.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Previous Literature
Chapter Three
MyCAA Scholarship and Data
Chapter Four
Service Member Retention
Chapter Five
Methodological Approach and Empirical Analysis
Chapter Six
Initial Findings on MyCAA's Relative Cost-Effectiveness for Retention
Chapter Seven
Conclusions
Appendix A
Data and Distributions of Key Variables
Appendix B
Subgroup Analyses
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and Family Policy and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.