Decision-Making Modules for the RSS-POD Supply Management Game

A Game-Based Assessment of Crisis Decision Making During Inventory Management and Distribution of Medical Countermeasures

Andrew M. Parker, Shoshana R. Shelton, Paul Dreyer, Christopher D. Nelson, Edward W. Chan, Amy L. Maletic, Matthew W. Lewis

Published Oct 11, 2009

This document introduces and explains two new modules for the RSS-POD Supply Chain Management Game, a Microsoft Excel-based, computer simulation game designed to provide practice in managing inventories of medical countermeasures during a largescale public health emergency. As with an earlier version of the game described by Chan et al. (2009), players perform the role of inventory manager at a Receipt, Storage, and Staging (RSS) facility and must allocate inventory among multiple points of dispensing (PODs). This new version of the game introduces Modules 4 and 5, which are designed to promote group discussion regarding decisions about how to allocate scarce resources. Specifically, in Module 4 players must decide how many and which points of dispensing (PODs) to open in the face of a staffing shortage. In Module 5 players must decide how to allocate and dispense medication when shipment delays cause a temporary inventory shortage. The RSS-POD Supply Chain Management Game is part of a larger set of tools developed by RAND that states and localities can use to assess and improve readiness related to the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS). Since 2006, RAND has been working with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of the Strategic National Stockpile (CDC DSNS) to develop assessments of jurisdictions’ SNS-related capabilities.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Parker, Andrew M., Shoshana R. Shelton, Paul Dreyer, Christopher D. Nelson, Edward W. Chan, Amy L. Maletic, and Matthew W. Lewis, Decision-Making Modules for the RSS-POD Supply Management Game: A Game-Based Assessment of Crisis Decision Making During Inventory Management and Distribution of Medical Countermeasures. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR692.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.