Adaptation by Intelligent Adversaries to Defensive Measures

Framing Adaptation Options and Demonstrating Assessment of Attacker Preferences Using Proxy Intelligence Data

Published in: The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation (2018). doi: 10.1177/1548512918802976

Posted on RAND.org on October 02, 2018

by Brian A. Jackson, David R. Frelinger, Jennifer Kavanagh, Brett Andrew Wallace

Read More

Access further information on this document at SAGE Publications

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Addressing adaptation by intelligent adversaries and its implications for risk modeling and security planning requires understanding the ways attackers can respond to new defensive measures. Adversaries can make various types of tactical or target substitutions, seek to hide from defenses, avoid them without changing targets or locations, attack them directly, simply absorb and tolerate their effects, or make other organizational changes to compensate for them. Each of these options has distinct risk effects created directly or due to opportunity costs. Operationalizing this type of analysis requires linking the theoretical options adversaries have to what is known about their behavior. We illustrate that process by using a set of data sources to demonstrate how attacker preferences can be assessed. We use open-source historical data on past responses by al-Qa'ida and associated groups as a way to characterize the groups' "expressed adaptation preferences." As a prospective data set, we use a convenience sample of material from jihadist internet posting boards and a small selection of publicly released seized documents using quantitative coding for attacker preferences or decision drivers. The results of both sets of analyses demonstrate complementary ways for exploring preferences that have advantages for taking adversary adaptation into account in risk analysis and security planning.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.