The Days After a Deal with Iran

Implications for the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime

Jeffrey Kaplow, Rebecca Gibbons

Expert InsightsPublished Feb 2, 2015

Cover: The Days After a Deal with Iran

One of a series of RAND Perspectives on what the Middle East and U.S. policy might look like in "the days after a deal" with Iran, this Perspective examines a deal's implications for the nuclear nonproliferation regime. Slowing or stopping Iran's nuclear development is an important nonproliferation accomplishment, but the international community will need to find ways to mitigate some of the deal's negative consequences.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Kaplow, Jeffrey and Rebecca Gibbons, The Days After a Deal with Iran: Implications for the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime, RAND Corporation, PE-135-RC, February 2015. As of September 18, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE135.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Kaplow, Jeffrey and Rebecca Gibbons, The Days After a Deal with Iran: Implications for the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE135.html.
BibTeX RIS

This research was prepared as part of the Stanton Nuclear Security Fellows Program at the RAND Corporation.

This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.