Improving the Goal-Setting Process for U.S. Department of the Air Force Recruiters

by Tiffany Berglund, David Schulker, Tracy C. Krueger, Nelson Lim

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The U.S. Department of the Air Force has historically used a simple approach to allocate goals to recruiting groups, proportionally assigning goals to each based on its five-year production average. However, many factors influence whether the U.S. Department of the Air Force can successfully produce contracts; therefore, the same factors that influence contract production should be considered during the goal-setting process. This Perspective compares and contrasts the current process with a more comprehensive model-based goaling process that accounts for factors influencing contract production.

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was commissioned by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Force Management Integration and conducted by the Workforce, Development, and Health Program within RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This publication is part of the RAND Corporation Perspective series. RAND Perspectives present expert insights on timely policy issues. All RAND Perspectives undergo peer review to ensure high standards for quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.