Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback52 pages $20.00

The purpose of this study, in broad terms, was to narrow the knowledge gaps regarding computer uses in schools by describing the patterns of microcomputer-based mathematics and science instruction employed by teachers recognized as "unusually successful" in their instructional applications of microcomputers. More specifically, the study addresses the following questions: (1) What patterns of microcomputer-based mathematics and science instruction are employed by public school teachers nominated as unusually successful in instructional uses of microcomputers? (2) Are these patterns of use related to district and school policies regarding microcomputers? Organizational and compositional contexts of classrooms? Teachers' attitudes toward computers? Teachers' subject-matter and computer knowledge? (3) What do these teachers (and the research literature) recommend about educating teachers to incorporate microcomputer-based instruction into their teaching repertoire? Improving the quality of courseware?

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.