Supporting Employers in the Reserve Operational Forces Era

Are Changes Needed to Reservists' Employment Rights Legislation, Policies, or Programs?

by Susan M. Gates, Geoffrey McGovern, Ivan Waggoner, John D. Winkler, Ashley Pierson, Lauren Andrews, Peter Buryk

Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback122 pages $27.95 $22.36 20% Web Discount

Research Questions

  1. What are the legal protections provided by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), what obligations do they impose on employers, and what are the areas of ambiguity?
  2. To what extent do employers understand their obligations under USERRA?
  3. What factors influence the cost of USERRA protections for employers?
  4. What changes to USERRA or to U.S. Department of Defense policy would employers find useful in fulfilling their obligations under USERRA?

Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR), a U.S. Department of Defense office (DoD), asked the RAND Corporation to study the implications that using the Reserve Components (RCs) as an operational force can have for employers in view of employment rights protections for RC members. Specifically, ESGR wanted to know whether changes are needed to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 1994 legislation designed to prevent hiring discrimination and bolster job protection for members of the armed forces, including those of the RCs; ESGR support programs; or RC activation and deployment policies, given the increased mobilization of the National Guard and Reserve and the continuing need to balance the rights, duties, and obligations of employers, RC members, and RC members' families. The study involved the review and analysis of existing research and data related to USERRA and the effects on employers of employee absences more generally, an analysis of the 2011 DoD National Survey of Employers, focus groups with employers conducted in 2012, interviews with RC chiefs conducted in 2011, and a legal and legislative history review of USERRA. This report describes key findings from the analysis.

Key Findings

Current Legal Protections for Reserve Component Members Are Generally Clear and Consistent with Other Employment Laws

  • In its current form, there are two main aspects of the law: (1) general antidiscrimination protection based on veteran status, and (2) reemployment rights after periods of military duty.

Understanding of Current Law, Employer Obligations, and Where to Go for Help Is Incomplete

  • Employer knowledge of current law and support is incomplete.

The Effects That Legal Protections Can Have on Employers Is Highly Varied and Influenced by a Wide Range of Factors

  • Duty-related absences can pose substantial burden on employers in some circumstances, but the impacts are highly varied and influenced by a wide range of factors. The impact of legal protections stems from the direct and indirect implications of duty-related absence for business operations, rather than from the costs of the specific employment and reemployment rights contained in the legislation.
  • The following factors are associated with greater employer impact: longer or more-frequent absences; the absence of highly skilled employees, key personnel, or employees who are "one of a kind" in their organizations; and employer characteristics, including employer size, with smaller employers being more likely to experience impacts.

No Single Change to Policy or Support Programs Would Address the Concerns of All Employers

  • There was no consensus among employers as to the support programs that would be most useful to their businesses in the event of a duty-related absence.

Recommendations

  • There is no need for substantial revision to the legislation.
  • Providing greater flexibility to employers holds more promise than broad changes to protections or utilization policy.
  • Employer Support for the Guard and Reserve should continue its efforts to promote awareness of current protections.
  • Employer peer resource networks could assist employers in dealing with duty-related absences.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    USERRA Overview

  • Chapter Three

    Perspectives on the Impact That Military Duty–Related Absences Can Have on Employers

  • Chapter Four

    USERRA Protections: Employer Impact

  • Chapter Five

    Employer Awareness of USERRA and Perspectives on ESGR

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions and Recommendations

The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.