To assess the relationship between New Leaders' Aspiring Principals program and school and student outcomes, this report compares New Leaders principals with other new principals in the same district, analyzing student achievement, program-graduate placement and retention, and satisfaction with the Aspiring Principals program.

Read Online

Preparing School Leaders for Success

Evaluation of New Leaders' Aspiring Principals Program, 2012–2017

by Susan M. Gates, Matthew D. Baird, Christopher Joseph Doss, Laura S. Hamilton, Isaac M. Opper, Benjamin K. Master, Andrea Prado Tuma, Mirka Vuollo, Melanie A. Zaber

Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

Does not include Appendixes.

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Appendixes

Available only online.

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback114 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Research Questions

  1. How do the outcomes of schools or students led by New Leaders principals compare with those of other schools or students in the district?
  2. Are program graduates hired as principals in partner districts more or less likely to stay in their positions, compared with other new-principal hires?
  3. Are program graduates hired as principals in partner districts?
  4. What are the characteristics of program participants?
  5. Are participants' assessed competencies associated with their later placement and retention as principals, as well as with outcomes in their schools or for their students?
  6. How do participants and partner districts view New Leaders and the Aspiring Principals program?

A growing body of research points to the ways in which principals influence teachers, classrooms, and, ultimately, student achievement. New Leaders aims to prepare transformational school leaders by partnering with districts and charter schools to offer rigorous, research-based training for aspiring principals. The Aspiring Principals program is New Leaders' signature program and has three core features: selective recruitment and admission, training and endorsement, and support for principals early in their tenure.

This report is a follow-up to the 2014 evaluation of New Leaders' Aspiring Principals program. Focusing on the revised program, which was first implemented in 2012, the authors present evidence of the effectiveness of the revised Aspiring Principals program and share lessons that can inform principal-preparation policy and practice.

To assess the effect of New Leaders' Aspiring Principals program, researchers analyzed whether schools and students led by graduates of the program outperformed comparison schools and students in the same district, focusing on student achievement and principal retention. They also examined program graduate placement and satisfaction with the Aspiring Principals program.

Key Findings

  • Students in K–8 schools led by New Leaders principals outperformed comparison students in K–8 schools led by other new principals on achievement tests.
  • Individual-level student attendance was higher for students who attended K–8 schools with a New Leaders principal.
  • New principals who completed the Aspiring Principals program were more likely than other new principals in the same districts to remain at their schools as principals for a second year.
  • New Leaders principals displayed competencies in the Aspiring Principals program, such as instructional leadership and adult and team leadership, that were related to school, student, and principal-retention outcomes.
  • A large share of Aspiring Principals completers were hired into principal positions by partner districts.
  • Aspiring Principals program participants and partner districts viewed the program favorably.

Recommendations

  • Evaluations of principal-preparation programs should examine multiple program features and outcomes at the principal, school, and student levels.
  • Principal-preparation programs can help build internal capacity within partner districts.
  • Within- and between-district analyses could provide complementary evidence regarding program effectiveness.
  • Multiyear evaluations are needed to capture the effect of program features on school outcomes because, for the program to affect students, participants must complete the program, be hired as principals, and remain in their positions long enough to have an effect on schools and students.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Background

  • Chapter Three

    Data and Methods

  • Chapter Four

    Key Findings

  • Chapter Five

    Implications

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by New Leaders and conducted by RAND Education and Labor.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.