- What are educators' opinions of SEL and what SEL-related programs, practices, and assessments are they implementing?
- In what ways do teachers' and principals' responses differ?
- To what extent are responses related to school characteristics?
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the process through which students develop such interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies as teamwork, social awareness, self-regulation, and emotional awareness. Although schools in the United States have always addressed these competencies, in recent years, the availability of resources to address SEL has expanded, and educators are increasingly adopting SEL-focused curricula, practices, and assessments in their classrooms and schools. This report presents findings from nationally representative samples of teachers and principals surveyed for the RAND Corporation's web-based American Educator Panels; these educators responded to questions addressing their beliefs about the importance and value of SEL in schools, their approaches to promoting and measuring SEL, and their opinions regarding supports for improving SEL. The findings should be useful to developers of SEL-related resources such as curricula, assessments, and training programs, and to researchers, policymakers, and practitioners who are interested in understanding what kinds of supports and resources educators need.
SEL is a top priority, with educators using a variety of strategies
- Large majorities of principals described SEL as a top priority.
- Most educators rated a wide range of SEL skills as important, although teachers tended to assign greater importance to SEL skills than principals.
- Educators believed that SEL programs can improve student outcomes and school climate.
- Elementary teachers and principals tended to use SEL programs and curricula, while teachers and principals in secondary schools tended to use informal practices.
- Educators reported using a variety of strategies, ranging from classroom activities to community outreach, to improve students' SEL skills.
- Schools used a variety of SEL initiatives and curricula; positive behavior systems and trauma-informed practices were common.
- Majorities of teachers and principals reported that their schools measured SEL.
- Majorities of principals and teachers received training to support SEL; inservice training was more common than preservice training.
- Many principals and teachers reported that having more time would improve their school's ability to address SEL.
- It is important to demonstrate to educators that SEL can lead to benefits and that it can support, rather than detract from, work to improve student academic achievement.
- Training through residencies could expose educators to SEL and give them an opportunity to hone their SEL practices in a supervised setting.
- Providers of assistance and support should explore ways to increase educators' access to information about program quality and effectiveness. Educators need guidance to make sense of SEL assessment data in the context of other information about the classroom, school, and community environments.
- Support providers can work with school-based educators to determine what programs, practices, and strategies are in place or being considered and use this information to develop supports that are applicable to that context.
- SEL supports should build students' social and emotional strengths and not simply address behavioral challenges.
- Those who support educators to implement SEL programs and curricula should consider ways to help teachers and school leaders integrate SEL into other activities, such as academic instruction.
The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Education and Labor and supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For this document, different permissions for re-use apply. Please refer to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation section on our permissions page.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.