Adaptive Engagement for Undergoverned Spaces
Concepts, Challenges, and Prospects for New Approaches
ResearchPublished Jul 13, 2022
This report is a compendium of expert insights regarding opportunities for investing in science and technology to increase U.S. ability to engage in long-term competition in undergoverned spaces. This exploration marks an initial step toward developing a functional perspective on determining whether new approaches to strategy and engagement are warranted, and what the implications of those steps might be.
Concepts, Challenges, and Prospects for New Approaches
ResearchPublished Jul 13, 2022
In this report, several authors explore the concept of undergoverned spaces (UGS) and the concepts, challenges, and prospects for developing new approaches to long-term competition in open-ended or infinite games within the context of UGS. This exploration marks an initial step toward developing a functional perspective on determining whether new approaches to strategy and engagement are warranted, and what the implications of those steps might be regarding the actions considered, the rationale for choosing among those actions, and the ways that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and National Security Enterprise (NSE) organize to perform them.
This report is divided into four parts, each presenting different perspectives on the challenges posed by UGS and the opportunities to improve how the United States competes within them.
Chapter One
Part One
Perspectives on Undergoverned Spaces
Chapter Two
Undergoverned Spaces: Problems and Prospects for a Working Definition
Chapter Three
Undergoverned Spaces and the Challenges of Complex Infinite Competition
Chapter Four
Perspectives on State Governance, Undergovernance, and Alternative Governance
Chapter Five
Chapter Six
Building Strategies for Long-Term Competition: Infinite Games and Adaptive Planning
Part Two
(Social) Science Investments for Undergoverned Spaces
Chapter Seven
Science and Technology Planning for the Future — Operating in Three Realms
Chapter Eight
The Need to Invest in Social Science Infrastructure to Address Emerging Crises
Chapter Nine
Chapter Ten
Part Three
Supporting Long-Term Planning in the Face of Uncertainty and Change
Chapter Eleven
Chapter Twelve
Toward an Analytic Architecture to Aid Adaptive Strategy for Competing in Undergoverned Spaces
Chapter Thirteen
Multi-Stakeholder Research and Analysis for Collective Action in Undergoverned Spaces
Part Four
Centering Decisions in Analysis for Adaptation and Competition
Chapter Fourteen
Using Technology to Improve the Agility of Force Generation Processes
Chapter Fifteen
Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Seventeen
Difficulties in Analyzing Strategic Interaction: Quantifying Complexity
Chapter Eighteen
Evolving Security: Societal Immunity and Competing Demons or Cooperating Angels
Chapter Nineteen
Gaming Undergoverned Spaces: Emerging Approaches for Complex National Security Policy Problems
Chapter Twenty
This research was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.