Comparative Analysis of U.S. and PRC Efforts to Advance Critical Military Technology

Volume 1, Analytic Approach for Conducting Comparative Technology Assessments

Sarah Harting, Daniel Gonzales, Michael J. Mazarr, Jon Schmid

ResearchPublished Jan 2, 2024

This report outlines an approach for comparatively assessing the capacity, progress, and impact of critical military technologies under development in the United States and the People's Republic of China. This approach is designed to be applicable across a diverse range of technologies and used to conduct comparative analyses of U.S. and PRC efforts to develop and deploy critical technologies for military use.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Harting, Sarah, Daniel Gonzales, Michael J. Mazarr, and Jon Schmid, Comparative Analysis of U.S. and PRC Efforts to Advance Critical Military Technology: Volume 1, Analytic Approach for Conducting Comparative Technology Assessments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2197-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.