Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback79 pages $24.00 $19.20 20% Web Discount

Research Question

  1. What could communities, government officials, nongovernment organizations, businesses, and scientists do to build community resilience to large oil spills?

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill was the largest in U.S. history, releasing an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. The scale of the disaster motivated diverse stakeholders to examine the human dimensions of the spill and how communities' resilience to similar threats could be improved. This examination is needed because, as long as humans depend on extracting oil and gas for energy, coastal regions are at risk for spills. In this report, the authors explore how communities, government officials, nongovernmental organizations, businesses, and scientists can build community resilience to large oil spills. Researchers found mixed evidence of distress associated with the DWH disaster and a variety of factors that affected the nature and severity of people's experiences.

Key Findings

Mixed findings on mental health distress; income loss and prior trauma drove negative effects

  • There was mixed evidence that the DWH oil spill caused short- and long-term mental health distress; life disruption (particularly income loss), prior trauma, and various sociodemographic characteristics drove negative mental health symptoms.
  • Higher levels of social capital had a protective effect against spill-related stress, except for groups with high attachments to damaged resources (e.g., fishing households).
  • Some social groups reported experiencing more distress than others, partly because of differing levels and types of prior trauma, disruption from the oil spill, or available support.

Industry suffered short-term economic loss, while households reported suffering economically in the long term

  • Economic losses from the DWH oil spill were short-term for the commercial fishing, oil and gas, and tourism industries. However, years after the oil spill, high proportions of households reported very negative effects on their financial situations.
  • Economic effects were highly heterogenous; the most-severe economic effects were reported by poorer households.

Communities were stressed by the spill and by litigation afterwards

  • Conditions following the DWH oil spill reflected reduced trust in authorities, weakened social networks, increased perceptions of inequitable distribution of post-spill resources, and increased domestic violence.
  • Uncertainty over the extent of oil spill impacts, competing narratives of responsibility and blame, protracted litigation and compensation processes, and perceptions of injustice related to these factors were chronic stressors.
  • Different groups demonstrated different experiences of loss and recovery. Fishing households in particular reported high levels of DWH-related disruption of social routines.

Recommendations

  • Focus on the needs of people and their communities.
  • Address the complexity of the resource-dependent social systems in which disasters are managed.
  • Enhance partnerships, leveraging diverse sets of skills and strengths.
  • Connect the past, present, and future contexts to support disaster recovery efforts.
  • Deepen the evidence base for building community resilience.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Conceptual Framework of Community Resilience and Vulnerability to Environmental Disasters

  • Chapter Three

    Mental Health Distress Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

  • Chapter Four

    Economic Impacts Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

  • Chapter Five

    Community Distress Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

  • Chapter Six

    Recommendations

  • Chapter Seven

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Report Methodology

  • Appendix B

    Key Empirical Journal Articles and Other Reports Included for Review

  • Appendix C

    Health, Economic, and Community Key Messages Presented at the Workshop

Research conducted by

Funding for this research was provided by a grant from the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative and gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The research was conducted in the Community Health and Environmental Policy Program within RAND Social and Economic Well-Being.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.