Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

A persistent challenge facing education policies has been the difficulty of ensuring local implementation of instructional reforms by teachers. Despite numerous instructional reform initiatives, teacher practices have remained relatively constant over the past century. Some research studies attribute the lack of implementation of local reforms to teachers’ interpretation of the policy messages underlying these reforms, which may be influenced by their views of their discipline and their students, and by the social context of the school, which influences not only their interpretation, but also the extent and quality of implementation. In this study, the authors examine teachers’ response to policy messages related to mathematics and science reforms. Using information collected from semi-structured interviews, teacher surveys, and teacher daily logs, the authors identify the policy messages that influence teachers and discuss the factors that either facilitate or hinder teachers’ implementation of these policies.

The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Education.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.