Qualifying Military Health Care Officers as "Joint"
Weighing the Pros and Cons
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback110 pages||$30.00||$24.00 20% Web Discount|
The challenges facing the U.S. military at home and abroad have highlighted the need for officers, including health care officers, who are educated and trained in joint matters and prepared to take on the new roles and responsibilities demanded by the current environment. This research, part of a larger project examining the preparation and support of leaders in the medical field in the civilian and military sectors, evaluates the need for and feasibility of qualifying health care officers as “joint” officers. Traditionally, officers could attain joint qualification by attending joint professional military education courses and serving in billets that provide them with joint duty experience and are included on the Joint Duty Assignment List (JDAL). New policy states that officers can also receive this experience in non-JDAL billets. However, both the traditional and current policies preclude the inclusion of certain positions, particularly health care officer positions, on the JDAL and allow waivers on a case-by-case basis from the joint requirement for promotion to general or flag officer positions. In addition to an extensive policy review, the study included an assessment of data from the 2005 Joint Officer Management Census survey suggesting that some health care officers are indeed serving in billets that need and provide joint duty experience for which they should receive credit.
Table of Contents
Developing Military Leaders
Joint Officer Management
Health Care Officers Serving in Joint or Potentially Joint Billets: Findings from the 2005 JOM Census Survey
Qualifying Health Care Officers as Joint Officers: Implementation Issues
Qualifying Health Care Officers as Joint Officers: Alternatives and Recommendations for Implementation
Comments of Health Care Officers: 2005 JOM Census Survey