Mar 1, 2022
Photo by Staff Sgt. Tina Villalobos/U.S. Army
Behavioral health technicians (BHTs) are enlisted service members who work alongside licensed mental health providers (MHPs), including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurse practitioners, psychologists, and social workers. They serve as care extenders, helping the Military Health System (MHS) improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the behavioral health care that it provides.
BHTs perform a variety of tasks in both garrison and operational settings, including clinical care, case management, operational outreach, and administrative management. RAND researchers recently conducted a survey of BHTs and MHPs to shed light on BHT practice and inform MHS decisions to optimize BHT integration. The survey identified tasks that BHTs most commonly perform, along with how proficient BHTs are in performing those tasks. This brief highlights key findings from the research and strategies for how the MHS can maximize the potential of the BHT role.
BHTs can be trained to perform a wide variety of clinical tasks. The survey asked BHTs to indicate how often they performed 22 individual tasks. The findings highlighted a group of essential tasks—clinical activities that are frequently performed by BHTs and for which they are likely to receive in-depth training.
These essential tasks were all related to patient screening:
The figure shows the percentage of BHTs who reported performing each of these tasks often or very often.
The survey also identified tasks that BHTs performed less frequently and that, with additional support, training, or supervision, could be performed by BHTs.
MHPs shared reservations about BHTs delivering psychosocial interventions, especially evidence-based psychotherapy for mental health or substance use disorders. However, 82 percent of BHTs and 70 percent of MHPs agreed that BHTs could have a greater impact if they were trained to deliver treatment approaches across multiple diagnoses. BHTs could facilitate psychoeducational groups, such as for smoking cessation or sleep hygiene. BHTs could also provide supportive counseling, focusing on evidence-based approaches that have been adapted for non-MHPs, such as problem-solving therapy and motivational enhancement therapy.
In civilian medical contexts, it is common for care extenders to monitor patient progress. In the military behavioral health context, this might include assessing patient progress using symptom measures administered over time (i.e., measurement-based care). In addition to the essential task of administering measures through the Behavioral Health Data Portal, BHTs could monitor symptoms over time. BHTs could also monitor patient progress by reviewing self-monitoring logs (e.g., sleep journals) or other patient homework.
Photo by Sgt. Marquis Hopkins/U.S. Army
Clinical support tools and templates can be used to structure clinical tasks and ensure that both BHTs and MHPs are on the same page about what BHTs' tasks should include. For screening tasks, such as conducting intake interviews, this could include a standardized interview template that BHTs receive during their initial training. For psychosocial interventions, it might include training BHTs in specific evidence-based practices that address common needs, such as problem-solving therapy. In terms of monitoring patient progress using symptom measures, it could include clinical support guidance on how to interpret change over time, identify meaningful trends, or identify clinical thresholds. BHTs and MHPs could make use of the clinical support tools available through the Psychological Health Center of Excellence (e.g., screening measures, pocket guides, patient worksheets).
There are efforts underway in the MHS to standardize expectations for BHT supervision—for example, to clarify when an MHP should directly observe or monitor BHT clinical activities, such as in crisis situations or when patient safety is a concern. However, supervising providers can exercise discretion in their approach to supervision in other situations. It would be beneficial for supervising MHPs to formalize their expectations with BHTs at the beginning of their working relationship, such as the frequency and format of supervision. MHPs could also develop plans to ensure BHTs' ongoing adherence to evidence-based practices (e.g., by occasionally observing psychoeducational groups). Better communication and supervision are likely to improve the quality of BHT practice and maximize BHTs' on-the-job training.
Initial technical training for BHTs is designed to be brief and to provide foundational knowledge and skills. The expectation is that additional skills will be developed on the job and through continuing education. Such opportunities can ensure that BHTs are proficient in their core tasks and support new skill development, with content tailored to individual BHTs' levels of experience.