A growing body of evidence shows that social-emotional skills predict the long-term outcomes of students. Despite this evidence, few studies have investigated the extent to which educators promote social-emotional learning among their students. This American Educator Panels Data Note details the extent to which a nationally representative sample of teachers and school leaders report setting goals for the social-emotional growth of their students.

Are Educators Setting Goals for Social-Emotional Learning?

Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys

Christopher Joseph Doss, William R. Johnston, Goke Akinniranye

ResearchPublished Apr 7, 2020

A growing body of evidence shows that social-emotional skills predict the long-term outcomes of students, even after controlling for differences in academic achievement. Despite the evidence that social-emotional learning (SEL) contributes to student success, few studies have investigated the extent to which educators promote SEL among their students. This American Educator Panels Data Note details the extent to which a nationally representative sample of teachers and school leaders report setting goals for the social-emotional growth of their students. Results indicated that about 60 percent of teachers and principals report setting goals for student SEL growth. However, teachers were less likely to report that their school leadership set these goals compared with principals' self-reports. These results indicate that SEL goal setting is substantial but by no means universal. Further, the gap in perceptions of school leader goal setting indicates that as principals begin or continue to develop goals, they should aim to create a schoolwide strategy that is communicated to teachers and take into account efforts that are already underway in classrooms. One barrier to these efforts may be the lack of schoolwide systems for assessing SEL skills.

Key Findings

Educators implement social-emotional learning, but principals and teachers have different views

  • About 60 percent of teachers and principals reported setting goals for growth in student SEL.
  • Teachers were less likely to report that school leadership set SEL goals than principals were to self-report goal setting.
  • Nonurban teachers were less likely to report that their school leaders are setting goals for SEL growth, and nonurban principals were less likely to report that district leaders are setting goals for SEL growth.

Recommendations

  • As principals begin or continue to set goals for SEL growth, they must be sure to create a coherent schoolwide strategy and communicate that strategy more effectively to teachers.
  • School leaders must take into account efforts already underway in their classrooms as they create schoolwide strategies.
  • Setting schoolwide goals requires understanding students' strengths and weaknesses, so schoolwide systems for assessing social-emotional skills can help in that endeavor.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Doss, Christopher Joseph, William R. Johnston, and Goke Akinniranye, Are Educators Setting Goals for Social-Emotional Learning? Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys, RAND Corporation, RR-2575/2-1-BMGF, 2020. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2575z2-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Doss, Christopher Joseph, William R. Johnston, and Goke Akinniranye, Are Educators Setting Goals for Social-Emotional Learning? Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2020. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2575z2-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Education and Labor and supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For this document, different permissions for re-use apply. Please refer to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation section on our permissions page.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.