Putting Professional Learning to Work

What Principals Do with Their Executive Development Program Learning

Elaine Lin Wang, Heather L. Schwartz, Monica Mean, Laura Stelitano, Benjamin K. Master

ResearchPublished Oct 7, 2019

Cover: Putting Professional Learning to Work

Since 2004, the National Institute for School Leadership (NISL) has offered the Executive Development Program (EDP), a leadership program for sitting school principals that is typically delivered in two-day workshops once per month over 12 months. From its inception through 2018, 15,000 principals across 23 states have participated in the EDP.

This report presents findings from part of RAND's evaluation of the EDP, focusing on how principals applied their EDP learning and coaching to their work as school leaders. The authors draw on a survey of 172 EDP participants, phone interviews of 74 principals, and nine in-depth case studies to examine what improvement efforts principals with EDP experience attempted in their schools and what strategies they applied to reach their goals.

Key Takeaways

Takeaways from the survey and interviews

  • Principals felt that the EDP improved their ability to conceptualize and lead school improvement efforts.
  • Principals learned and adopted EDP concepts and processes.
  • Principals would recommend the EDP to fellow principals.
  • Principals highly valued NISL coaching.
  • School improvement takes time: Over several years, principals leveraged EDP learning and NISL coaching to enact strategies reflecting core EDP concepts and processes that supported staff take-up of school improvement efforts and eventual changes in teachers' instructional practices.

Eight strategies for school improvement identified in the case studies

  • Establish a positive school culture as a foundation for school improvement (see cases 2, 4, 5, and 9).
  • Set a clear vision during launch and repeatedly reiterate commitment to the improvement effort (see cases 3, 4, 6, and 8).
  • Identify a willing and enthusiastic leadership team (see cases 1, 2, 3, 4, and 9).
  • Establish structures and processes for teacher collaboration and learning (see cases 1, 2, 5, and 6).
  • Press teachers to adopt targeted instructional practices to support student learning (see cases 1, 7, 8, and 9).
  • Increase transparency around instruction (see cases 2, 3, 7, and 9).
  • Surface inconsistencies in practice or policy and continue to align system components (see cases 1, 4, and 9).
  • Distribute leadership, identifying experts to share and model practices (see cases 4, 5, and 8).

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Wang, Elaine Lin, Heather L. Schwartz, Monica Mean, Laura Stelitano, and Benjamin K. Master, Putting Professional Learning to Work: What Principals Do with Their Executive Development Program Learning. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2019. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3082.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.