Competency-based education meets students where they are academically, provides students with opportunities for choice, and awards credit for evidence of learning, not for the time students spend studying a subject. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation asked RAND to evaluate three competency-based education grants in terms of implementation, students' experiences, and student performance.

Read Online

Competency-Based Education in Three Pilot Programs

Examining Implementation and Outcomes

by Jennifer L. Steele, Matthew W. Lewis, Lucrecia Santibanez, Susannah Faxon-Mills, Mollie Rudnick, Brian M. Stecher, Laura S. Hamilton

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback128 pages $34.95 $27.96 20% Web Discount

Research Questions

  1. What materials did the Project Mastery sites develop and implement during the pilot period, and to what extent did their efforts align with the defining features of competency-based education?
  2. What were the key tensions or challenges that emerged in the implementation of competency-based approaches?
  3. Among students exposed to the Project Mastery pilot programs, how did their self-reported learning experiences vary within and across programs?
  4. To what extent did students' exposure to competency-based education models predict their academic performance in mathematics, reading, attendance, or promotion to the next grade?

In 2011, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation created the Project Mastery grant program to support competency-based education initiatives in large school systems that serve a high proportion of disadvantaged youth. Competency-based education meets students where they are academically, provides students with opportunities for choice, and awards credit for evidence of learning, not for the time students spend studying a subject. The Foundation asked RAND to evaluate these efforts in terms of implementation, students' experiences, and student performance. This report presents final results from that evaluation, offering an overview of competency-based education and the Project Mastery grant projects and describing the implementation of competency-based educational features under each project. The report concludes with six lessons for policy, partnerships, and practice.

Key Findings

Not All Competency-Based Programs Look Alike

  • Each Project Mastery grantee emphasized different aspects of competency-based education. Some placed greater emphasis on student choice and project-based learning, while others focused on flexible pacing and evaluation for proficiency.

Tensions Exist in Implementing the Approach

  • Sites faced challenges in determining how to provide credit for out-of-school activities, including afterschool activities and travel-based learning experiences.
  • Sites experienced tension in holding all students to a common definition of proficiency and evaluating students strictly based on performance, not effort.
  • Sites faced challenges in providing enough computer hardware so that students could use new competency-based curricula or in identifying funds that would permit expansion of new curricula beyond the pilot initiatives.
  • Sites reported that students with weak academic backgrounds may require extra support under competency-based models.

Student Experiences Were More Similar Than Expected

  • Because the programmatic details of the Project Mastery sites were varied, one striking finding was the similarity of students' self-reported experiences across sites.
  • The highest student reports of engagement, flexible pacing, and choice came from a site in which respondents were focused on yearlong, self-directed projects that applied academic content to real-world contexts.

Student Performance Varied Across Sites

  • Effects of competency-based models on student learning appeared most positive in programs that put primary emphasis on student choice with project-based learning.
  • However, the research design did not permit causal inference, and these findings could be at least partially due to students' or teachers' selection into the programs.

Recommendations

Lessons for Policy

  • Competency-based education programs should be assessed on a variety of near-term and longer-term outcomes.
  • In a competency-based system, flexibly timed accountability tests may provide better measures of progress than fixed, annual tests.

Lessons for Partnerships

  • In collaborating with technology developers, schools should negotiate favorable terms and anticipate technical challenges.
  • Collaboration between sites and funders should consider local infrastructure and capacity.

Lessons for Practice

  • Increased student autonomy calls for engagement through skillful teaching.
  • Competency-based education systems must be vigilant about equity.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Evaluation Settings and Methodological Approach

  • Chapter Three

    Intervention Development and Implementation

  • Chapter Four

    Tensions in the Implementation of Competency-Based Models

  • Chapter Five

    Students' Experiences in the Project Mastery Pilot Classes

  • Chapter Six

    Student Outcomes in the Project Mastery Sites

  • Chapter Seven

    Conclusion

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and was produced within RAND Education, a division of the RAND Corporation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.