Using data from the 2016 and 2018 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members, RAND researchers produced descriptions of the circumstances surrounding soldiers' self-identified most serious sexual assault experiences. The authors provide information on which sexual assault behaviors occurred, characteristics of perpetrators, and the times and places the experiences occurred.

Sexual Assault Experiences in the Active-Component Army

Variation by Year, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Installation Risk Level

Avery Calkins, Matthew Cefalu, Terry L. Schell, Linda Cottrell, Sarah O. Meadows, Rebecca L. Collins

ResearchPublished Oct 20, 2022

To better understand the circumstances surrounding sexual assault in the Army, RAND Arroyo Center researchers created descriptions of active-component soldiers' most serious sexual assault experiences using data from the 2016 and 2018 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members. In this report, researchers describe the most common types of behaviors that occurred, characteristics of alleged perpetrators, and times and places in which the experiences occurred. They also explore differences by gender, sexual orientation, and installation risk level.

Nearly 90 percent of victims believed that the assault was committed for a sexual reason, and more than half indicated that the assault was meant to be abusive or humiliating. The typical perpetrator of victims' most serious sexual assault experiences was a male enlisted member of the military acting alone. Perpetrators were most often a military peer of the victim; perpetrators who were strangers to the victim were uncommon; and assaults by spouses, significant others, or family members were comparatively rare. Approximately two-thirds of victims' most serious experience of sexual assault occurred at a military installation.

The authors found substantial differences by gender, especially in terms of the types of sexual assault behaviors victims experienced and in terms of the setting in which victims were sexually assaulted. The authors also found some evidence suggesting that sexual minorities—that is, individuals who identify with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual—may experience more-violent sexual assaults and more assaults that are meant to abuse, humiliate, haze, or bully, especially among men.

Key Findings

  • The most common types of sexual assault behaviors were intentional touching of private areas of the victim's body and penetrative sexual assaults with a penis. The typical perpetrator was a male enlisted member of the military who was a peer or someone of higher rank and who acted alone. Soldiers' most serious experiences typically occurred at a military installation, and assaults at work, in quarters, and while at a party were equally common. Fewer than half of soldiers' most serious sexual assaults involved the use of alcohol by the victim. Similarly, fewer than half of soldiers' most serious sexual assaults involved the use of alcohol by the perpetrator.
  • Male and female sexual assault victims differed in typical types of sexual assault behavior(s) experienced, perceived perpetrator intent, professional and personal relationship to the perpetrator(s), time and place the experience occurred, involvement of alcohol, and association with hazing.
  • Substantive differences were found between heterosexual; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other; and nonrespondent female sexual assault victims in the typical types of sexual assault behavior(s) experienced, gender of the perpetrator(s), professional relationship to the perpetrator(s), place and time of the experience, and association with bullying.
  • Substantive differences were found between (1) heterosexual and (2) sexual minority and nonrespondent male sexual assault victims in the typical types of sexual assault behavior(s) experienced, use of force, gender and military status of perpetrator(s), personal and professional relationship to the perpetrator(s), place of the experience, drug and alcohol involvement, and association with bullying, hazing, and stalking.

Recommendations

  • Because there are large differences by gender and sexual orientation in the circumstances surrounding sexual assault in the Army, sexual assault prevention training materials should emphasize the most common behaviors and scenarios and be expanded to incorporate the experiences of men, sexual minorities, and others whose experiences differ from those of heterosexual women.
  • There is a crucial lack of data on the sexual assault experiences of sexual minorities in the Army. These data would allow for greater understanding of the sexual assault and other potentially discriminatory experiences of sexual minority soldiers. Changes in the way sexual orientation data are collected, used, and protected could remedy this data limitation. However, the Army cannot act alone, and any changes would need to be reflected in DoD-level policy.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
182 pages
List Price
$49.95
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2022
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 182
  • Paperback Price: $49.95
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-1-9774-1012-2
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1385-2
  • Document Number: RR-A1385-2

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Calkins, Avery, Matthew Cefalu, Terry L. Schell, Linda Cottrell, Sarah O. Meadows, and Rebecca L. Collins, Sexual Assault Experiences in the Active-Component Army: Variation by Year, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Installation Risk Level, RAND Corporation, RR-A1385-2, 2022. As of September 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1385-2.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Calkins, Avery, Matthew Cefalu, Terry L. Schell, Linda Cottrell, Sarah O. Meadows, and Rebecca L. Collins, Sexual Assault Experiences in the Active-Component Army: Variation by Year, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Installation Risk Level. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1385-2.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by the Personnel, Training, and Health Program within RAND Arroyo Center.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.