Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Questions

  1. What is the best model for determining the economic outcomes of the social-distancing policies mandated by local and state governments during the COVID-19 pandemic?
  2. What are the economic trade-offs that are inherent when considering removing social distancing policies?
  3. How do economic outcomes differ for different policies?

Many state and local officials are making social-distancing policy decisions based on the actions of other locations rather than through a decisionmaking framework that evaluates these measures and their reduction of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This report provides an initial assessment of the possible short-term economy-wide effects of social distancing. These results should be taken as rough order-of-magnitude estimates meant to help inform decisionmakers during the COVID-19 crisis.

Key Findings

  • Authors developed a computable general equilibrium model to evaluate economic outcomes. The Economic Impact Analysis for Planning Social Accounting Matrix for each state is used to calibrate the initial values of parameters within the model.
  • This work is based on readily accessible data and uses a simplified small, open-economy model of a metropolitan area. It focuses on five different policies, from school closures to population-wide quarantines.
  • Although much of the discussion within the popular media has focused on lower-income households, our analysis suggests that higher-earning households could experience a larger proportion of income decline from social-distancing policies.
  • Under optimistic assumptions of minimal closures, states with large populations are projected to suffer greater economic losses (possibly a reflection of higher per-capita incomes stemming from labor-supply reductions); under pessimistic assumptions of population-wide quarantines, losses are more concentrated in the Midwest (possibly because these states produce relatively high amounts of final-demand goods).

Funding for this independent research was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The research was jointly conducted by the Community Health and Environmental Policy Program in RAND Social and Economic Well-Being and the Access and Delivery Program in RAND Health Care.

This report is part of the RAND research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.