The People’s Liberation Army Navy’s Approach to Maintenance Management
Cooking Dumplings in a Teapot
ResearchPublished Jun 18, 2026
The authors of this report examine how the rapid growth and modernization of China’s navy inform maintenance management and activities, approaches that other navies have taken to balance maintenance demand and supply and how China’s approaches compare with them, how maintenance is controlled and organized to meet maritime-specific requirements, and the factors that shape China’s ability to maintain and sustain its forces.
Cooking Dumplings in a Teapot
ResearchPublished Jun 18, 2026
The ability for navies to procure, field, and sustain large surface combatants is central to modern power projection. The U.S. Navy’s approach to ship procurement coupled with infrastructure issues and workforce shortages at U.S. shipyards have led to significant delays in both naval shipbuilding and maintenance activities. Tensions between high operational demands and the need to conduct training and maintenance to sustain ship readiness levels have resulted in significant mishaps and crashes. The ability of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) to sustain its growing inventories of more-capable systems will rely on its logistics capabilities and processes. Understanding the PLAN’s approach to maintenance management is a necessary step in assessing the People’s Liberation Army’s ability to sustain a modernized force, and there are implications for both competition and conflict.
In this report, the authors examine how the rapid growth and modernization of the PLAN inform maintenance management and activities, approaches that other navies have taken to balance maintenance demand and supply and how the PLAN’s approaches compare with them, how maintenance is controlled and organized to meet maritime-specific requirements, and the factors that shape the PLAN’s ability to maintain and sustain its forces.
This research was sponsored by the Office of Net Assessment and conducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Program of the RAND National Security Research Division.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.