Modeling Infectious Behaviors

The Need to Account for Behavioral Adaptation in COVID-19 Models

Published in: Journal on Policy and Complex Systems, Volume 7, Number 1, pages 21–32 (Spring 2021). doi: 10.18278/jpcs.7.1.3

Posted on on October 20, 2021

by Raffaele Vardavas, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Paul K. Davis, Andrew M. Parker, Lawrence Baker

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The current COVID-19 pandemic affects billions of people worldwide, and its unprecedented scale and duration are causing extraordinary disruptions to lives and livelihoods. Policymakers have taken comparably extraordinary measures to mitigate the spread of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) by implementing a range of nonpharmaceutical public health interventions (NPIs), from partial closings of business to complete lockdown and mask-wearing (Aledort et al., 2007). NPIs continue to be critically important as new vaccines roll out in an attempt to reach herd immunity as quickly as possible. Several models have been developed to help policymakers compare interventions such as NPIs and vaccination. Such models attempt—dependent on various uncertain assumptions—to forecast cases, deaths, and medical supply needs; predict the timing of peaks in cases; and estimate if and when to expect additional waves or surges. However, a key limitation of many existing models is that they do not directly integrate adaptive behavioral components to account for how risk perceptions, protective behaviors, and compliance with interventions change over time and ultimately influence transmission. Patterns of COVID-19 transmission shape the subsequent patterns of behavioral responses to the disease and, in turn, are shaped by such responses. Changes in risk perceptions during the pandemic affect behaviors, including adherence to NPIs and willingness to vaccinate. Also, the effects that NPI shave on a population activities have led to pandemic fatigue and a decline in compliance with recommended restrictions (Alagoz et al., 2020; Craneet al., 2021; Kantor and Kantor, 2020). Moreover, perceptions of the risks and benefits of vaccination change, increasing or decreasing the vaccine hesitancy that undermines attempts to reach herd immunity (Yaqub et al., 2014). Decision-makers are faced with the daunting task of interpreting model predictions while simultaneously estimating how the behavioral responses should alter predictions. Despite considerable uncertainties, it may be possible to improve these estimates by explicitly modeling behavioral responses to intervention, rather than merely varying parameters such as willingness to be vaccinated. Useful explicit modeling will require tapping new sources of data as we recommend in this article.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.